Censorship of Music is the Responsibility of the Parent Essay

Censorship of Music is the Responsibility of the Parent Censorship in music is a topic that has brought about much controversy over the past two decades. There have been many different arguments on the topic, however the question still lingers is should censorship still remain. Before you can form an opinion on this, you must hear both sides of the argument on this much-debated topic. Some people believe that music should be censored so all audiences can hear it without it containing any offensive lyrics. Others believe it should not be censored and musical artists should be able to speak, sing, rap, or rhyme freely without anyone censoring them. Whether a person finds a work obscene depends largely on his or her moral or religious†¦show more content†¦Many musical artists feel that when they are forced to change lyrics their rights are being violated. In some artists songs they like to express their feelings towards somebody or something, and it hurts them to be censored because the new words derived are not from their heart. Du e to the amendment made by our founding fathers I do not believe there will ever be an answer to the question whether or not music should be censored. The way I see it, it should not be censored. Many children often hear explicit language from older siblings or parents at an early age. They believe that since someone they look up to uses those words, they should too. Eventually, everyone will be exposed to language they do not find acceptable. Foul language is not permitted on Medias such as television or radio because it is an free access media. However, on albums the artist is allowed to use any words he or she sees fit. The vexing question, of course, is, Who should decide what you read or view- the church, the state†¦or you? (War of Words: The Censorship Debate by George Beahm page xiii) My opinion on that is : You. I still, however, find it unnecessary to censor stations generally viewed by mature audiences. It is now aShow MoreRelated Censorship: Helpful Or Hindering? Essay821 Words   |  4 PagesWhat exactly is censorship? Some feel censorship is a violation of their rights. Others say censorship is a must in the violent, abusive world we call â€Å"society.† Who has the right to censor? Who doesn’t? What needs to be censored, and what doesn’t? The fact of the matter is that there are many pros and cons in the music and entertainment industry about censorship. Personally, I believe that the consumers and viewers should be charged with the ultimate responsibility of censorship. One major areaRead MoreThe World All Types Of Music Artists1617 Words   |  7 Pagesall types of music artists are expressing their feelings and views in their works about what they see and what they know. Songs are best way of using freedom of speech right while expressing all feelings and emotions. The question is, are they really free to express their feelings wholly? Unfortunately they are not really free even though First Amendment says they are. Music is a big part in every individual’s life, and everyone has their own and unique tastes in the kind of music they listen toRead MoreMusic Censorship Essay625 Words   |  3 PagesMusic Censorship Since the being of time people have been making and listening to music. Music has been considered the best way to express ourselves. The Bible even talks about how music was used to praise God. Music has been used for all type of things ranging from to getting a girl to notice guy, trying to get over a broken heart, or maybe losing a love one. Now society says that music has become too violent and sexually oriented. Many people have different point of view on this topic someRead MoreCensorship And Censorship Of Music1544 Words   |  7 PagesThroughout the years, music has evolved and transformed in many ways. However, there are restrictions in today’s music, otherwise known as, censorships. A crisis has emerged concerning the issue of censorship. This argument consists of two possible stances: one, supporting the continuation of censorship, and two, eliminating the status quo of censorships in the music industry. There have been countless debates and arguments regarding the issues of censorship ever since the U.S. Congress passed theRead MoreEssay on America Needs Music Censorship550 Words   |  3 PagesAmerica Needs Music Censorship â€Å"Obscene: so excessive as to be offensive† (http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary). This is the way the Webster dictionary defines obscene. How do you? Some say obscene is vulgar; others say the best way to describe obscene is through disgust. No matter how it is thought of, obscene material is everywhere in society. Television is becoming more liberal, magazines are less edited, and music is more abrasive. At some point, the public must put its foot downRead MoreThe Idea of Censorship952 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Censorship Con The idea of censorship is based upon the idea that there are some things that people, especially young people, should not be exposed to. People must be protected from stories or images or ideas which may be upsetting. They must also be protected from negative things which they might try to emulate. There is an obvious flaw in this system of logic; this perspective assumes that people cannot think for themselves. If they are exposed to violence or sex or bad language, then they willRead MoreEssay on Censorship of Music1406 Words   |  6 PagesCensorship of Music In todays society, all types of music artists are expressing their views, opinions and feelings in their songs about what they see and what they know. This is on of the great things about this country, the freedom to express yourself. It is not fair, nor is it constitutional that music should be censored in anyway. It is not only rap music trying to be censored it is in all types of music. They are taking away their rights and it isnt fair. As reported in the New York TimesRead MoreCensorship of Music: Limiting One’s Rights Essay1072 Words   |  5 PagesMusic has been under scrutiny on behalf of censorship for decades. Censorship is defined as an authorization to examine material and to remove or suppress what is considered morally, politically, or otherwise objectionable. Lyrics are essential to nearly everything in music; its poems, ballads, monologues, etc. They may take the form of actual spoken or sung sounds or of written words, as literature does. Without the musical component, you’re left with literature and words; this leavesRead More First Amendment And Music Censorship Essay1284 Words   |  6 Pagesthe art form known as music. Musics verbal expression bonds our society through our emotions and experiences. This fundamental right of freedom of expression is being threatened by public and governmental groups who believe they have authority to monitor and decide what others should experience. The censorship of music lyrics is a violation of our First Amendment right, and public groups should not be allowed to bypass this right to censor obscene lyrics produced in the music industry. ThroughRead MoreReal Monsters : Tackling The Beast Of Censorship1680 Words   |  7 PagesMONSTERS: Tackling the Beast of Censorship As a seven year old I stumbled across a trailer for a new horror movie. I can’t remember the title, and I can’t remember the story, but to this day when it’s late at night and the house is silent I can sometimes hear the click click click of the creature’s long nails on my window. The things you see as a child can stay with you, as the monster did with me, so it’s no surprise that there is a such controversy over the topic of censorship in the media. Ultimately

Essay on Guilt In The Scarlet Letter And The Crucible

The presence of guilt has been felt by all human beings. As guilt grows in a person’s life it eventually begins to have a deteriorating effect on the individual. In both The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible more than one of the characters are experiencing some form of guilt and the effects of the public’s opinion on their own personal sins. Each character’s guilt originates from a different personal problem and with each character’s guilt comes a different reaction. Miller and Hawthorne use the source of guilt, the actions resulting from it and the eventual consequences to portray the concept of a guilty conscience to the reader.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;†¦show more content†¦With Hester however, her guilt come from â€Å"’ the scarlet token of infamy on her breast and the sin-born infant in her arms â€Å"’(69). Her sin was already known and the only guilt that she felt was when she looked at her daughter or caught a glimpse of her letter in a mirror. The sources of guilt in the novels are not all the same, however in all situations, their guilt comes from some sort of sin, whether it be considered a sin in their heart, or in the eyes of others around them. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;As guilt exists in the lives of Hester, Dimmesdale, Elizabeth and Proctor, it brings them to respond to it in different ways. Dimmesdale’s guilt actually brings him to self destruction. His appearance begins to change drastically, he becomes pale and very sickly. He beats himself up inside and it was believed by some that he wore a scarlet letter â€Å"imprinted in his flesh†(240). So, not only was he scarred inside, but also outside. Proctor handled his guilt with a different approach. His actions towards his wife changed, in that he does nothing without looking to please her first. He hopes to gain her forgiveness in order to remove the weight off of his heart. The men in both situations are more dramatic and open with their guilt, however, the women keep it bottled up inside. Hester does nothing to express her guilt toShow MoreRelatedGuilt in the Scarlet Letter and the Crucible Essay995 Words   |  4 PagesScarlet Letter/Crucible Essay The presence of guilt has been felt by all human beings. As guilt grows in a persons life it eventually begins to have a deteriorating effect on the individual. In both The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible more than one of the characters are experiencing some form of guilt and the effects of the publics opinion on their own personal sins. Each characters guilt originates from a different personal problem and with each characters guilt comesRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Between The Crucible And The Scarlet Letter1111 Words   |  5 Pagesthe loss of control and power over the people. The Scarlet Letter written by Nathaniel Hawthorne and The Crucible by Arthur Miller depict those same societal issues. The Scarlet Letter explains the consequences, that a women has to face on her own after she committed adultery in a Puritan society. The Crucible follows the Salem witch trials and the mass hysteria of the people in, an also, Puritan society. Both The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible had a similar puritan society and way of questioningRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Between The Crucible And The Scarlet Letter864 Words   |  4 PagesMiller was born on October 17, 1915, and he published his play, The Crucible, in January of 1953. Nathaniel Hawthorne was born on July 4, 1804, and his book, The Scarlet Letter, came out to print in March of 1850. These two types of literature were published roughly 100 years apart, so there are minute changes in the way they were written. Both are set in early 1700’s Massachusetts, but The Crucible is in Salem, and The Scarlet Letter is set in Boston. There are many similarities and differences betweenRead MoreThe Crucible And The Scarlet Letter1322 Words   |  6 PagesThe Crucible and The Scarlet Letter have several commodities in common. A basic summary of The Crucible is, it’s about a village, Salem, in the 1600’s, wherein witchery is loose and several conflicted souls must be captured, purified, confessed, or hung. The attempt to dispose of all witchcraft was tampered with by citizens of Salem being dishonest and deceitful. Lots of the deception stemmed from the jealousy, vengeance, and other personal vendettas. The Scarlet Letter summarized is that it is aboutRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter And The Crucible821 Words   |  4 Pagesemitted in the Scarlet Letter and The Crucible. Both literary works share similar ideas, but also have quite a few differences. Nathaniel Hawthorne, the writer, utilizes symbolism for the scarlet letter, to be a symbol of Hester’s shame. The embroidered â€Å"A† on Hester’s bosom symbolizes the sin of adultery which she had committed. Not only was the sign of embarrasment used but also the scaffold had great importance in the Scarlet Letter. The scaffold was used as place of humiliation and guilt, where theRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter And Arthur Miller s The Crucible1050 Words   |  5 PagesNathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, the repercussions of committing adultery are exhibited through characters in two different puritanical societies. Arthur Dimmesdale, Hester Prynne, John Proctor, and Abigail Williams are all victims to this. Despite living in sincere societies, these characters behave hypocritically in order to hide a concealed truth, resulting in internal ignominy, until they ultima tely confess. Arthur Dimmesdale shows his guilt and hypocritical natureRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter and The Crucible Essay example1847 Words   |  8 PagesHuston  1   Zakary  Huston   Mr.  Montalbano   AP  English  Language  and  Composition   11  August  2014   The  Scarlet  Crucible      Both  Arthur  Miller’s  Ã¢â‚¬â€¹ The  Crucible​   and  Nathaniel  Hawthorne’s  Ã¢â‚¬â€¹ The  Scarlet  Letter​   include   instance  of  settlers  of  the  New  England  colonies  being  affected  by  Puritan  law.  Their   commentary  on  Puritan  society  is  spread  throughout  their  works.  Their  views  on  the  laws  set   forth  by  Puritanism  are  easily  found  within  their  stories  about  the  various  occurrences  in  a   theocracyRead MoreJohn Proctor And The Scarlett Letter1299 Words   |  6 PagesDuring the 16th and 17th century a group of reformed protestant called Puritans had a profound effect on the establishment of Religion, this influenced early American society. Arthur Miller’s, The Crucible and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s, The Scarlett Letter texts prevail the theme of Religion and Adultery. These particular authors wrote during the Puritan times and conveyed this time period in their texts while exploring the similarities and difference of Religion and Adultery in the Puritan CommunityRead MoreConfession And Acceptance Of The Crucible By Nathaniel Hawthorne1969 Words   |  8 Pagespeople underestimate the powerful affliction that is guilt. People think that if they simply turn their back on what they have done and to the feelings of remorse over the wrongdoing, these feelings will eventually subside. However, this is not the case, as the moment one turns his or her back on feel ings of guilt is the exact moment it sneaks up behind that person and eats him or her alive. In 1850, Nathaniel Hawthorne published The Scarlet Letter, which tells the story of two people who commit adulteryRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter And The Crucible1502 Words   |  7 PagesThe Scarlet Letter and The Crucible are two stories both set in the early days of the Massachusetts colony. Both of these stories have many similarities between them, including setting, situations, and conflict. The two stories were also very different. The effects of sin on the characters, how they deal with their sin, and the consequences of their actions are different in each story. The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter are different works and although they deal with similar conflicts the consequences

Anucha Browne Sanders vs Madison Square Graden Free Essays

The executive, Anucha Browne Sanders, has asked for an additional $9. 6 million in compensatory damages, which the judge will decide on in the coming weeks. The Garden and Mr. We will write a custom essay sample on Anucha Browne Sanders vs Madison Square Graden or any similar topic only for you Order Now Thomas said they would appeal. Ms. Browne Sanders accused Mr. Thomas of verbally abusing and sexually harassing her over a two-year period. Less than a month after she formally complained to the Garden, the company chairman, James L. Dolan, fired her. In court, the Garden cited numerous explanations for the dismissal, including poor job performance and the claim that she had interfered with the Garden’s internal investigation of her accusations. Ms. Browne Sanders, who wept when the decision was read, described her victory as important for â€Å"the women who don’t have the means and couldn’t possibly have done what I was able to do,† and for â€Å"everybody that cares about working in a civil work environment. † Mr. Thomas emerged from the courthouse and said, â€Å"I want to say it as loud as I possibly can: I am innocent; I am very innocent. I did not do the things that she accused me in the courtroom of doing. † Patting his chest for emphasis, he added, â€Å"I am extremely disappointed that the jury did not see the facts in this case. I will appeal this. † The sordid four-week trial was the latest chapter in the story of a once-respected N. B. A. franchise. During Mr. Thomas’s nearly four-year tenure as president and now coach, the team has spent millions on free agents without any progress toward a championship. And still to come, the Garden faces a second sexual harassment trial brought by a former Rangers cheerleader against team officials. The Garden was ordered to pay $6 million for subjecting Ms. Browne Sanders to a hostile work environment and another $2. million for firing her in retaliation. The jury ordered that Mr. Dolan pay $3 million for the retaliation. In his testimony, Mr. Dolan said that he alone made the decision to fire her. Mr. Dolan had no comment on the verdict or the award. Although found liable, Mr. Thomas will not have to pay any of the punitive damages for sexually harassing Ms. Browne Sanders with unwanted sexual advances. One holdout on the seven-member jury kept the panel from holding him financially responsible for the harassment. The juror Sally Anne Foster, 49, of Cortlandt Manor, N. Y. said it was just â€Å"different personality traits† among the jurors that led them to hold Mr. Dolan, not Mr. Thomas, financially liable for Ms. Browne Sanders’s claims. Asked if she believed Mr. Dolan’s testimony, Ms. Foster said: â€Å"I can’t say. I’m not a psychiatrist. † United States District Court Judge Gerard E. Lynch is expected to make a decision as early as next month on compensatory damages for Ms. Browne Sanders, a formerNorthwestern University basketball star and mother of three, who was fired in January 2006 from her $260,000-a-year job as the Knicks’ senior vice president of marketing. She said that the firing by Mr. Dolan led her to search for more than year to find her current job as the associate athletic director at the State University of New York at Buffalo, at about half her salary with the Knicks. The trial painted Mr. Thomas as the foul-mouthed president of basketball operations who clashed with Ms. Browne Sanders about their executive responsibilities. It featured testimony about sex between the team’s star,Stephon Marbury, and a Knicks intern in his truck; a slipshod internal Garden investigation of Ms. Browne Sanders’s claims; and the hiring of Mr. Marbury’s cousin and a boyfriend of Mr. Dolan’s stepdaughter as Knicks employees. The trial and the verdicts exposed more concern about the state of the Knicks, and the Garden, under Mr. Dolan’s leadership. Mr. Thomas stepped in to coach after Mr. Dolan fired Larry Brown, who received an $18. 5 million contract settlement during an arbitration by N. B. A. Commissioner David Stern. The Garden refused to settle the case against Ms. Browne Sanders, exposing the organization to ridicule in newspapers and in television reports. But the verdicts will not lead to sanctions by the league. Although the league penalizes players, coaches and team owners for criminal infractions, said Tim Frank, the league’s vice president for basketball communications, â€Å"Our policies do not encompass civil litigation. † The claims that Ms. Browne Sanders made against Mr. Thomas appeared to come down to a test of her credibility as a little-known executive against his celebrity standing and Hall of Fame status. Her claims that he repeatedly referred to her as a â€Å"bitch† and made unwanted advances had little corroboration from witnesses. Still, they stood up to a barrage of testimony by witnesses for Mr. Thomas and the Garden that her job performance had dramatically floundered in 2005. â€Å"If this was something I made up, it would have been a lot juicier,† Ms. Browne Sanders said in an interview. After the verdict, Mr. Thomas left for the Knicks’ training camp in Charleston, S. C. , where he arrived later in the afternoon. Ms. Browne Sanders gathered with her legal team and relatives for a prayer circle outside the courthouse. In its statement, the Garden said, â€Å"We look forward to presenting our arguments to an appeals court and believe they will agree that no sexual harassment took place. Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond Law School and a former civil litigator, doubted the appeal would succeed. â€Å"The jury heard the facts and it is unusual that an appeals court would overturn a jury finding which was so fact-intensive,† he said in a telephone interview. â€Å"There isn’t much basis unless there was a legal error, and Jud ge Lynch has a very good reputation for making sure his cases are fairly and properly tried. † Tobias said that the jury not holding Mr. Thomas financially liable â€Å"is not a large enough inconsistency that could have this overturned. † How to cite Anucha Browne Sanders vs Madison Square Graden, Papers

A Civil Action - Movie free essay sample

The Marxist approach can best explain the process and outcome of the case in A Civil Action. Section 1: Karl Marx sided with three principles regarding law and how it relates to the upper and lower classes in society. They are: law is a product of evolving economic forces; law is a tool used by the ruling class to maintain its power over the lower class and the means of production are owned by the ruling class. Marx believed that law is a structure of power. In this case the victims of families were the working class and the powerful corporations such as Beatrice Foods and W. R. Grace and Company are the ruling class. These two companies own their means of production meaning they do not need resources from others in order to keep their businesses running smoothly. Facher and Cheeseman, the defendants of the case, knew that the opposing side was not set financially. This gave them the opportunity to draw out the case as long as possible while Schlichtmann’s firm would be struggling to get by financially day by day. Not only to the defendants control the means of production but also they had professionals to clean up the â€Å"dirty† work that could possibly cause harm to others. This way it is even more difficult to find flaws in the company and reveal their mistakes. However this case does relate to a Marxist approach when dealing with the conflict theory. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie would always rule over the proletariat unless the members of proletariat would rise up and rebel against the ruling class. The case from this movie relates to Marx’s conflict theory because it shows what the working class had to rebel against. At first Anne Anderson and other affected families did not agree that $8 million was enough in the settlement. The bourgeoisie in A Civil Action committed crimes of dumping toxic waste and illegally withholding information. All of the complaining by families about the settlement not being enough forced Jan Schlichtmann to go back to the â€Å"board† and find more information on the case. Eventually Schlichtmann found enough information to find that the defendant’s were guilty, but it was financially hard for him to start an appeals case with no other lawyers on his side. His lawyers within the firm left after they decided the firm was not working collectively as a team. This case relates to Marx’s theory because the working class families in the movie eventually get a settlement that they deserve after the losses that occurred to them. The two huge corporations admitted that they had done wrong and also provided funds in hopes of the situation not happening again. Section 2: The research for this lawsuit begins when Anne Anderson’s son dies of leukemia. She believes that there are a number of harmful toxins that are dumped into the river that is connected to the city’s drinking water located in Woburn, Massachusetts. Between 15 years after the first incident, 12 children around the city of Woburn die from the effects of leukemia. Other families agreed with Anne Anderson that their children contracted leukemia from drinking the city’s water through the tap available in homes. Anne Anderson gets all of the families’ children who die from leukemia to group together and get Jan Schlichtmann to represent them as their lawyer. When Anne Anderson and other affected families presented their situation to Schlichtmann, they said they would be content with an apology from the responsible party. Schlichtmann knows that him and his small firm, Schlichtmann Conway Crowley, need lots of money in order to get an apology from whoever was responsible for contaminating the city’s water. Despite the need for more money in a large case like this, Jan Schlichtmann and his firm stop working on all cases except the Anne Anderson at el. , case. His firm began to have no other income for the expenses of the case. In this situation, Schlichtmann’s firm decides to pursue Beatrice Foods and the W. R. Grace and Company for the losses of children these families had to deal with. Originally when this case was presented to the major firms in the area, no one wanted accept the case. It was unwanted, so it became known as orphan case because it was believed that there would be no financial gain from the case. Similar to an orphan waiting to be brought into a home, there were many victims waiting to be brought justice by a lawyer. With this case being a civil case and a personal injury lawyer on the plaintiff’s side, there was room for questions about why Jan Schlichtmann wanted to take this case. Many personal injury lawyers are viewed in the public as bottom feeders or vultures that prey on the misfortunes of others. For example, in the beginning of the film there is a scene where Schlichtmann sees a man holding his head after a car accident. The lawyer from Cornell (Schlichtmann) instantly gives the man in pain his business and tells him to call him (for financially pursuing the person who inflicted the pain). The case involving Anne Anderson and other families who had children that died from leukemia because of the water’s city was the least concerns of any law firms. This was due to the fact that representing dead children in court will provide the least amount of financial gain. The perfect victim for a civil attorney is a â€Å"white male professional struck down at the height of his career†. A dead person is less valuable compared to a severely maimed person. A middle aged man is more valuable compared to someone that is in their mid 20’s. A woman is less valuable that a man; A single person is less valuable than a married one. A rich person is more valuable than a poor person, while being a black victim is less valuable than being white victim. Civil court is where the money lies within the justice system. Civil actions cases are worth more than criminal cases. 5% of all cases are civil cases with criminal cases being the lowest percentage of any case to occur. Many firms were afraid to go after the big corporations on the opposition but not Schlichtmann. Jan Schlichtmann, Kevin Conway and Bill Crowley represent the plaintiffs. A financial advisor in the firm also accompanies them. The main two lawyers that represent the defendants are Jerom e Facher (Beatrice Foods) and Will Cheeseman (W. R. Grace and Company). The defendants had millions of dollars to use for the case while Schlichtmann’s firm had a hard ime paying for an type of evidence that was found using their resources. The lawyers solely handled the case and a jury decided the outcomes. Lawyers decide how to approach cases and arguments rather than the victims choose what points to argue and what not to argue. If a settlement occurs or is close to occurring lawyers have the decision to claim the price they want or continue to negotiate. Each lawyer has intimate relationships within the system. There are a few more people involved with the case such as the Judge Walker Skinner, prosecutors, police and jurors. Upon examination of the Schlichtmann firm it seems as if the three lawyers and the financial advisor operate as a unit because of the similarities of being lawyers and dealing with the same issues in their firm. But if a person were to examine how effectively the group acts on a constant basis, things are not as easy as it seems. When it came time to settle the Schlichtmann firm was given two opportunities. The first meeting for a settlement Jan Schlichtmann asked for $320 million in order to pay themselves, the families’ suffering and a create a clean up project. Jan’s firm partners looked shocked when he started going over $25 million. The defendants instantly deny the settlement offer and have their minds set on getting the case tried in a courtroom. By the end of the case the highest settlement offer Schlichtmann’s firm offered was a settlement of $8 million. At first Jan did not want to settle at $8 million even though the financial advisor said $8 million would get everyone financially stable again. Everyone except for Jan did not want to take the $8 million for a settlement. About a week later they end up accepting the settlement due to the fact that the Schlichtmann firm was so broke that they were close to filing bankruptcy. These two miscommunications about settlements shows that the firm is not as perfect as it seems. If the lawyers within the firm cannot discuss and come to agreements with lawyers in the firm, they are not working as a cohesive group. These lawyers that are in Schlichtmann’s firm act as friends but only because they have to in order to achieve a common goal; win the case to make money. The social status of these players places them at the top of the list because they are white middle age males with important professions, being lawyers. As the movie goes on, there is a trend that the lawyers do not go home even to sleep or eat. Most of the time, they are in the work place and work in a sense becomes the home facility. In the community all those who know and understand the importance of being a lawyer respect these lawyers. The people in Schlichtmann’s firm are all integrated into the community in two ways. The first way is because they are a firm that files civil suits, giving them the option to help people in the community. The second way they are integrated in the community is through the status of the firm. Schlichtmann Co is a small firm that limits their options when it comes down to what case they are going to stick with. The firm does not have many resources so it does not look to represent national corporations in lawsuits but rather individuals or small families within Massachusetts who need some financial aid. In order to become a successful lawyer the saying goes â€Å"it’s not what you know, its who you know†. The better networking a lawyer has, it makes it easier for them to obtain resources to further a case. In the justice system, there are many people who have Ivy League law degrees giving lawyers a chance to connect with the judges. Since many judges were former prosecutors, they may have a connection to lawyers that approach their stand and may tend to agree with their statements. For example, the networking obtained from having an Ivy League degree can boost the chances of that person winning a case. People that graduate with a professional degree from an Ivy League school are sought after in the real world. There are constant email blasts from Ivy League graduates to fellow graduates about job offerings or help offered within the community of the graduate pool. In A Civil Action, there is a scene where Jan Schlichtmann gets invited to the Harvard Club (of Law) in New York by one of the Grace executives named Al Eustis. Al Eustis is a Harvard graduate and assumes that Schlichtmann is a Harvard graduate as well because he received information from a friend stating that. When Schlichtmann arrives to the Harvard Club he makes it clear that he is not to be confused with a Harvard graduate because he received his law degree from Cornell University. After hearing this information, Al Eustis’s whole body language changed and Jan went from being the Harvard friend to the Cornell enemy. Eustis almost tries to deny Schlichtmann and does not hear what he has to say simply because he went to a rival school, Cornell3. Eustis refuses to settle at anything over $8 million because he feels that the company would be coming off as guilty by settling a case with anything over that price. If Schlichtmann had been in the same situation but been a Harvard graduate the settlement probably would have gone up and Eustis would have been more friendly and open to hearing any information. The relationship between the plaintiff’s lawyers and defendant’s lawyers is a complicated one. â€Å"Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer†. This is how lawyers feel when dealing with the opposing side (enemy). Each lawyer from the case knows the same amount of background information but each player also has information that they do not want the opposing side to know about. Lawyers approach a lawsuit as if it is war. First, there is a declaration of â€Å"war† meaning the plaintiff provides details on why they are suing the defendant. Then there is a battle. Players that are dealing with the case risk a lot financially and emotionally but the chances of winning give the lawyers a reason to stay involved with the case. It is all a game and the winner takes all.